baz

Same clause, same facts, 146 days between the answers.

Counting twelve months is not the difficult part. Deciding when the twelve months began is, and on this clause there are three defensible answers. A countdown that shows one of them has hidden the only judgement that mattered.

MAT-2188 · Warranty claim notice

“…within twelve months of the Purchaser becoming aware of the breach”

Hardest to rebut First mention in an email from the site team 38 days left
trigger 14 Oct 2025 expires 14 Oct 2026

The earliest moment anyone on the Purchaser's side wrote the problem down. A counterparty will argue awareness began here and it is the hardest of the three to rebut.

Arguable Technical report confirming the defect 138 days left
trigger 22 Jan 2026 expires 22 Jan 2027

Awareness of a suspicion is not awareness of a breach. This is the most defensible middle position and the one most people assume without checking the first.

Weakest Board minute formally noting the claim 184 days left
trigger 9 Mar 2026 expires 9 Mar 2027

Convenient and difficult to sustain. Corporate formalities rarely determine when a party became aware of something its own staff had been discussing for months.

today

The register carries 38 days, not 184. Acting on the earliest defensible trigger costs an unnecessary notice; acting on the latest costs the claim. Those are not symmetrical and the default should not pretend they are.

4 of 6 dates were counted, not typed

A date taken from a clause and a date agreed on a call are different objects. One list that does not say which is which is a trap.

What Matter Date Days Where it came from
Serve notice to preserve the termination window MAT-2214 12 Sept 2026 6 Derived from a clause Variation Agreement No. 2, Clause 3
Response to the counterparty's exit-fee position MAT-2214 24 Sept 2026 18 Entered by hand Agreed on a call, no contractual basis
Warranty claim notice — on the earliest defensible trigger MAT-2188 14 Oct 2026 38 Derived from a clause SPA warranty clause, trigger contested
Option to extend the services term lapses MAT-2190 2 Nov 2026 57 Derived from a clause MSA Clause 4.2
Renewal decision for the data-room licence MAT-2188 1 Dec 2026 86 Entered by hand Internal, movable
Long-stop date for completion MAT-2201 15 Jan 2027 131 Derived from a clause SPA Clause 3.1

Four rules the register follows

The first is the one that decides everything else, and it is a deliberate bias rather than a calculation.

01 Default to the earliest defensible date
Not the most likely one. The cost of acting early is an unnecessary notice; the cost of acting late is the claim. Those are not symmetrical and the default should not pretend they are.
02 Show the alternatives, always
A single countdown is a decision disguised as a fact. Every derived date on the register opens onto the trigger it was counted from and the ones that were rejected.
03 Separate derived from diarised
A date taken from a clause and a date somebody agreed on a call are different objects. Mixing them in one list is how a movable internal deadline acquires the authority of a contractual one.
04 Recount when the file changes
An amendment landing in the matter re-runs every date derived from the clause it touches, and says which ones moved. Deadlines computed once at intake go stale silently.

What it will not compute

The third is a refusal rather than a gap. Statutory limitation interacts with facts a document set does not contain, and a wrong answer there cannot be undone.

It cannot tell you which trigger a court would take
It sets out the candidates with the argument for each. Choosing is legal judgement, and the page defaults to the earliest precisely because it is not making that call for you.
A derived date needs the clause in the file
Every date on the register was counted from a document the system could read. An amendment sitting in an inbox produces a register that is confidently, quietly wrong.
No statutory limitation periods are computed
Contractual periods are counted from their own wording. Statutory limitation is not, because the rules interact with facts a document set does not contain — and a wrong answer there is unrecoverable.
It does not chase anybody
It will tell the responsible person, repeatedly, on a schedule. Whether a notice gets served six days from now is a matter of somebody doing it.

The rest of the platform